There Are No Gifts There Ma’am
Quotes - Defense Witnesses (2)
Sen. Stevens to Prosecutor: “There Are No Gifts There Ma’am”
A week has gone by, and, aside from a post on Beltway Big Brendan Sullivan, we’ve left the Ted Stevens trial alone.
Why? Well, for one thing, the defense’s case hasn’t been nearly as theatrical as the prosecution’s. Stevens’ wife, a Washington lawyer, took the stand and said the gas grill, a gift, was dangerous and scared her. She also testified that the furniture provided in the chalet by former Veco CEO Bill Allen was tasteless, according to the NYT.
When Ted Stevens followed his wife on the stand yesterday, his direct testimony was similarly measured. Asked by his lawyer, Williams & Connolly’s Sullivan, whether he believed his disclosure forms were accurate and truthful, he said yes and confirmed that he never intended to file false statements. (Stevens faces charges that he accepted and failed to report more than $250,000 in gifts.)
But late today, when Stevens’ lawyers turned him over to the prosecution for cross-examination, things heated up a bit, according to this report from Politico. Lead prosecutor Brenda Morris reportedly peppered Stevens with questions, asking him why he knew so little about his Alaska chalet reservations, and why he let Allen run roughshod over him in using the house.
“You were a lion of the Senate but you didn’t know how to prevent another man from putting items in your house?” Morris reportedly asked. (Presumably, she was referring to the appliances and additions, such an expensive gas grill and a stained-glass panel, that were added as part of the makeover to his Girdwood, Alaska, home.)
“You’re making a lot of assumptions that are unwarranted,” he responded. “There are no gifts there ma’am.”
He reportedly added: “I’m not going to get in the middle of this game with you,” Stevens said. “You ask me questions and I’ll give you answers.”
.
.
...
Feisty Stevens spars with prosecutor A combative Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska sparred with a top Justice Department attorney Friday, exhibiting from the witness stand at his corruption trial the pugnacity that long has been his trademark on Capitol Hill. Grilled for 90 minutes by Brenda Morris in a pivotal moment in the case, Stevens ardently defended the way he handled disclosures of benefits he received from an oilman. In the process, he derided some of the questions posed to him. He complained that the government was drawing unwarranted conclusions about his conduct. And the long-serving Republican, a Harvard Law School graduate, offered advice to Morris about how to frame her queries. “I think you better rephrase your question,” he said acerbically at one point. “Your question is tautological.” -- Senator Ted Stevens . | . . |
The retorts tumbling from [Senator Stevens'] lips were far more interesting than the
questions: "I think you better rephrase your question. That question is
tautological. ... I wonder what you're saying, ma'am. ... What are you
talking about? ... Is that a question? I thought it was a statement." Usually the judge intervenes to stop prosecutors from badgering a witness; on Friday, Judge Emmet Sullivan asked the witness to stop badgering the prosecutor. "Wait until she finishes her question," the judge told Stevens at one point. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-stevens_bdoct19,0,3762388.story |
...
...
...
...
...
...
... ...
...